On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Richard Scobie <richard AT sauce.co DOT nz> 
wrote:
> I have just added 10 unlabeled, barcoded tape to a library that contains
> 10 labeled, barcoded tapes.
>
>  From the bat application, I have issued the following commands:
>
> update slots
>
> label barcodes
>
> At this point the bat console shows a list of the tapes that will be
> labelled, but this includes the 10 tapes that already have labels.
>
> Is it really going to relabel these?

No

>
> Also, in this scenario, are the tapes labeled in ascending slot order or
> ascending barcode order?

The latter.

>
> I notice that bacula chooses empty appendable tapes to write to based on
> the time they were labeled and I would prefer that they are used in
> ascending barcode order.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>



-- 
John M. Drescher

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users