On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Bill Arlofski <waa-bacula AT revpol DOT com> 
wrote:
> On 07/19/10 15:26, John Drescher wrote:
>
>>> JJ wrote:
>>> That worked! It So I basically need to wipe it and then readd to the bacula 
>>> by issuing 'label barcodes'?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> And the problem was that it was corrupt?
>>>
>>
>> The problem is that volume did not contain a valid volume label. It
>> appears that for some reason the labeling did not work when you first
>> added the volume. I am not sure of the cause of that.
>>
>> John
>
>
> John, it is possible that this was caused because he was initially using the
> rewinding tape device /dev/st0 instead of the non-rewinding device /dev/nst0?
>  You had cause this configuration issue earlier in the thread.
>
The reason why I did not think it was caused by that on the tape
KL0339 is because the tape was not used after the label operation. The
last written date was 000-00-00 00:00:00 and only a single block was
written to that tape.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users