[Bacula-users] disk based backup, interleaving pros/cons?

Subject:

From:

Joseph Dickson <joseph.dickson AT ajboggs DOT com>

To:

"bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>

Date:

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:32:26 -0500

Greetings..

I’m using completely disk based backup, with a custom autochanger script. When I initially set this up, I set the maximum job concurrency on each of my disk devices to 1, so that Bacula would be forced to only write one job to any given volume at any given time.

I’m just wondering, now that I’ve done that, is there any REAL advantage for me in not allowing Bacula to interleave on a disk based volume? Does it make the on-volume format a lot simpler?

Joe

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Use Import/Export slots of autochanger, Joseph Dickson

Next by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] disk based backup, interleaving pros/cons?, Josh Fisher

Previous by Thread:

[Bacula-users] what strategy for backing up files only once?, Ralf Gross

Next by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] disk based backup, interleaving pros/cons?, Josh Fisher

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]