Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] prune not working as expected

2009-12-15 06:22:40
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] prune not working as expected
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: subscription AT kkeane DOT com
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:18:03 GMT
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:30:52 -0800, Kevin Keane said:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Simmons [mailto:martin AT lispworks DOT com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:44 PM
> > To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] prune not working as expected
> > 
> > >>>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:11:38 -0800, Kevin Keane said:
> > >
> > > I have a couple older volumes that I expected to get pruned by now,
> > but they
> > > don't. I am using bacula 3.0.2 on OpenSuSE.
> > >
> > > Here is one example:
> > >
> > > |     244 | randamai_20091101223426_Full.bacula                    |
> > Archive   |       1 |  93,005,712,230 |       21 |    2,851,200 |
> > 0 |    0 |         0 | File      | 2009-11-02 02:11:00 |
> > >
> > > When I used the prune volume command, I saw the following (all as
> > expected):
> > >
> > > Enter *MediaId or Volume name:
> > > *244
> > > The current Volume retention period is: 1 month 3 days
> > > Continue? (yes/mod/no):
> > >  yes
> > >
> > > But this volume remains unpruned even though it is older than 1 month
> > and 3 days.
> > >
> > > One thing that might possibly be related: these volumes were created
> > with
> > > bacula 2.4.2. When I migrated to 3.0, I created a new database from
> > scratch
> > > and used bscan to import the volumes. That was about a week ago.
> > Bacula
> > > falsely assigned a retention time of 1 year; I corrected that with an
> > update
> > > pool command.
> > 
> > The problem is that the volume has status Archive, which was probably
> > set by
> > bscan.  You can only prune volumes with status Full or Used.
> 
> Thanks! Yes, I discovered that right after I posted. But even after I updated 
> the volume status to Used, prune still does not do anything.
> 
> I also checked: there are no jobs associated with these volumes.

Yes, prune should mark those volumes are purged if there are no jobs.  It's a
mystery.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users