Re: [Bacula-users] concurrent backups to one volume?
2009-06-25 10:16:09
Subject: |
Re: [Bacula-users] concurrent backups to one volume? |
From: |
terryc <terryc AT woa.com DOT au> |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:34:22 +1000 |
Silver Salonen wrote:
> As one device supports only one job, you have to create separate devices for
> each job you want to be able to run concurrently.
That isn't how I understand it. I am working on having multiple clients
feeding files into a single tape drive at the same time and expect that
chuncks of each job will be interleaved along the tape.
It should be the same for disk files, if that ishow you configure it
(say one file for each nights jobs).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] concurrent backups to one volume?, Andreas Schuldei
- Re: [Bacula-users] concurrent backups to one volume?, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] concurrent backups to one volume?,
terryc <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] concurrent backups to one volume?, John Drescher
- Message not available
- [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, terryc
- Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: concurrent backups to one volume?, Silver Salonen
|
|
|