On Tuesday 23 June 2009 00:19:08 Dan Langille wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been converted into a
> > struct, which is not the case.  Sorry for the false alarm.
>
> No worries.  If you want me to try out stuff on either 6.x or 7.x, just
> shout.

It would be very useful for you to compile Bacula 3.0.1 on 7.x with full 
encryption enabled.  That would assure me there is no problem.  My original 
concern stems from a recent piece of debug code that was not truely 
portable -- I removed that code but worry about some other similar problem 
concerning pthreads.

Regards,

Kern

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users