No, it's documented behavior. The numbers are actually the media IDs - 
basically, the database primary key. If you deleted these volumes from 
bacula completely, the numbering would start at 0005.

The reason for this scheme is to ensure that there are no collisions.

If you really want the numbering the way you propose, look into using 
the {NumVolumes} variable expansion in your Label= statement (I think 
that is the name, I can't recall for sure off the top of the head). This 
variable contains the number of volumes in your pool, so counting always 
starts with 0. However, there is a risk of naming collisions.

Mike Ruskai wrote:
> Starting with a new database, Bacula numbered volumes from three 
> separate pools like this:
>
> Client1Full0001
> Client1Incremental0002
> Client2Full0003
> Client2Full0004
>
> It should be this:
>
> Client1Full0001
> Client1Incremental0001
> Client2Full0001
> Client2Full0002
>
> Known bug?
>   
-- 
Kevin Keane
Owner
The NetTech
Find the Uncommon: Expert Solutions for a Network You Never Have to Think About

Office: 866-642-7116
http://www.4nettech.com

This e-mail and attachments, if any, may contain confidential and/or 
proprietary information. Please be advised that the unauthorized use or 
disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. The information herein is 
intended only for use by the intended recipient(s) named above. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
permanently delete the e-mail and any copies, printouts or attachments thereof.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users