Re: [Bacula-users] Doubt on recycling of volumes
2009-03-26 00:01:42
>>>>> "subscription" == Kevin Keane <subscription AT kkeane DOT com> writes:
> If you want tapes around forever, I think your
> best bet is to change the retention time in the
> pool to, say, ten years (I'm not sure if you
> can do an infinite retention time off the top
> of my head). Usually, if bacula can manage
> something, why would you want to do it
> manually?
I have an observation about the choice of retention times for
volumes to be kept indefinitely which I can make most easily make
by simply quoting the Volume Retention comment from our archive
Pool definition:
Volume Retention = 38 years # Can't find an explicit way to say "forever".
# We use "38 years" rather than a longer
# period because Bacula's pruning code
# (at least in release 2.4.3) does not deal
# well with Job or File Retentions long
# enough to predate the UNIX epoch, Jan 1, 1970.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|