Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Considering upgrade from bacula 1.38.11

2009-01-29 09:05:04
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Considering upgrade from bacula 1.38.11
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: ToMasz <nunatarsuaq AT gmail DOT com>, bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:02:58 -0500
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:19 AM, ToMasz <nunatarsuaq AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> I've been using bacula 1.38.11 for some time and recently upgraded
> successfully one of my file daemons to ver. 2.4.4.
> Now I'm thinking about complete upgrade on all machines including
> director but am unsure about possible pitfalls.
> Will my config files still work? Or maybe newer versions use other
> database solutions (I'm using internal bacula base)?
>

Your config files will work on every machine except possibly the
director. Its been a very long time (2 years?) since I have used 1.38
so I am not very sure of the changes needed.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users