Re: [Bacula-users] backup slow on local machine but fast from remote machine
2009-01-13 03:03:51
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
> Given the number of files backed up, the second job is probably an
> incremental backup.
> To compare backup speeds, run full backups only.
Yes, I did a full backup on both machines.
On server #2 Bacula should backup the daily snapshots of the Vmware
images. Image-filesize 4GB or more.
With the test last night I backed up other files on server #2 instead:
Rate: (server #1) 23847.7 KB/s
Rate: (server #2) 41120.5 KB/s
Previous backup test with VMware snapshots:
Rate: (server #1) 27357.5 KB/s
Rate: (server #2) 2440.4 KB/s
Maybe the problem was with failed or outdated snapshots.
--
Ralf Brinkmann
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|