Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] 2.4.4 rpm binary build problem

2009-01-12 14:25:45
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] 2.4.4 rpm binary build problem
From: Matthew Conley <matt.conley AT florencefilter DOT com>
To: Timo Neuvonen <timo-news AT tee-en DOT net>, bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:23:26 -0800
I always had issues installing on CentOS 64bit. Debian 64bit works fine, 
so does just using the tarballs. I hope someone sheds some light to that.

Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> I'm trying to build Bacula rpm binaries on 64-bit Centos 5.2
>
> Script I'm using:
>
> ----
> #!/bin/bash
> rpmbuild --rebuild \
> --define "build_centos5 1" \
> --define "build_x86_64 1" \
> --define "build_mysql5 1" \
> --define "build_python 1" \
> bacula-2.4.4-1.src.rpm
> ----
>
> It results in the following:
>
> ----
> <clip>
> checking whether to use NLS... yes
> checking where the gettext function comes from... libc
> checking for msgfmt... (cached) /usr/bin/msgfmt
> configure: error: Unable to find Gnome 2 installation
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.69060 (%build)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
>     InstallSourcePackage: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 10a792ad
>     user sbarn does not exist - using root
>     user sbarn does not exist - using root
>     user sbarn does not exist - using root
>     user sbarn does not exist - using root
>     user sbarn does not exist - using root
>     user sbarn does not exist - using root
>     user sbarn does not exist - using root
>     Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.69060 (%build)
> ----
>
> Well... I don't use a desktop lot, but I have gnome installed anyway, though 
> the error claims otherwise.
>
> This is quite new Centos install, and my first and only 64-bit system so 
> far. So, there are good chances there may be missing something from this 
> system. I already filled all the missing dependencies the build reported.
>
> I also have a 32-bit Centos system where the build runs ok, and comparing 
> the output of
> # rpm -qa | grep gnome | sort
> between these systems it looks I have the same "gnome-like" rpms installed 
> here.
>
> Any idea what might cause that error? Or is it some bug in the 64-bit build 
> process, maybe?
>
>
> Regards,
> Timo 
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It is the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>