As John already noticed, file daemons interact with storage daemon 
directly, director is only used to orchestrate the whole process.
If the director can access FD's and SD, it doesn't mean that FD's are 
able to access the SD.

I'd guess that there's either a firewall on the client (windows xp 
built-in firewall, maybe?), or it has something to do with windows 
having a different DNS/WINS config than linux.

Cheers,

Mantas.

John Drescher wrote:
>>  Hi John,
>>  all client names resolve and the the director connects to the
>> windows-client (I can see it in the windows bacula-monitor), but it says
>> (Files=0, Bytes=0,...):
>>
> 
> I am worried about if the client can connect to the storage machine
> backup because it does that directly not the other way around as I
> expected that to work. Also you are not using 127.0.0.1 or localhost
> anywhere in any of your configs are you?
> 
> 
> John
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
> Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users