Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC_nightly takes too much time
2010-04-08 07:15:23
Hi,
----- "Norbert Schulze" <ns04 AT nurfuerspam DOT de> wrote:
> Hello Tino, > > > Your I/O system seems saturated (70-80% of time is spent waiting for > > I/O). Try running only one BackupPC_nightly in parallel. > > Yesterday i set $Conf{MaxBackupPCNightlyJobs} = 2; to $Conf{MaxBackupPCNightlyJobs} = 1; > > Currently still running :-/ > admin 4/8 01:00 BackupPC_nightly -m 0 255 11896 > > Current vmstat 10 10 output: > procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- > r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa > 0 2 18012 7261024 688028 95976 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 1 78 18 > 0 2 18012 7263008 687052 94848 0 0 5634 1 483 201 0 0 68 31 > 0 2 18012 7267968 687212 90248 0 0 5431 3 505 208 0 0 68 31 > 0 2 18012 7267604 687876 89996 0 0 5697 0 496 196 0 0 69 31 > 0 2 18012 7268348 687092 89884 0 0 6065 4 521 202 0 0 68 32 > 0 2 18012 7268100 687616 89684 0 0 5555 2 487 200 0 0 68 31 > 0 2 18012 7268224 687548 89648 0 0 5571 0 492 208 0 0 69 30 > 0 2 18012 7267852 688032 89712 0 0 5564 1 483 198 0 0 70 30 > 0 2 18012 7267976 687484 89480 0 0 5768 3 490 197 0 0 69 31 > 0 2 18012 7268472 686848 89716 0 0 5362 2 510 211 0 0 67 32 >
Is this running in a VM? I often see high CPU wait times when doing disk I/O in a VM.
Gerald
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|