Note excuse my top posting since my comments reference the entire
thread here...
John, may I politely suggest that you will get more help and more
sympathy if you focus your time asking precise, relevant, and
well-formed questions rather than repeatedly criticizing the
documentation, rehashing FAQ's, and asking broad hypotheticals that
are not relevant to most people's conception of backups.
This is an open source project. If you think the documentation or
anything else is lacking, you are more than welcome to contribute
enhancements.
John Hudak wrote at about 14:32:51 -0500 on Sunday, February 14, 2010:
> my comments are interspersed below...
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
> <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>wrote:
>
> > John Hudak wrote at about 12:06:29 -0500 on Saturday, February 13, 2010:
> > > Hello:
> > > I am considering using an external USB drive as the storage for my
> > backups.
> > > I am running backup pc under Debian 5.0.
> > External USB drives are a *BAD* idea for multiple reasons:
> > - Slow
> > - Unreliable
> > - Subject to being disconnected
> > etc.
> >
> > Yes, I know 1, and 2 is 'it depends', and 3 is exactly the reason why I
> want to use usb drives
>
>
> > > Part 1
> > > What do I need to do to configure the USB disk as the target? (e.g. how
> > do I
> > > do it?)
> > > The USB disk is currently formatted as a NTFS file system. Do I *need*
> > to
> > > reformat it to ext3? or other?
> > - NTFS is not usually used - need to check whether it supports the
> > types of hard links required for BackupPC
> >
> > >
> > > Part 2
> > > Assume I am crazy paranoid about preserving backup data and I get a
> > second
> > > USB drive to serve as a backup to the first USB drive.
> > > Also assume that I am not concerned about the bandwidth across the
> > network
> > > or the various buses.
> > >
> > > >From a data reliability standpoint, is it better to run a backup
> > session to
> > > USB drive 1, and then repeat the backup to USB drive 2? OR
> > > run a backup session to USB drive 1, and then copy the backup
> > directories to
> > > USB drive 2???
> > Look at the archives and FAQ - this has been discussed *many* times so
> > no point in wasting peoples time in rehashing.
> >
> > I did a quick search of the archives before asking - I did not find a
> definitive answer...
>
>
> > > The first approach could have errors in different backed up files on
> > disk 1
> > > or 2 but given the odds, very unlikely that the same exact error would
> > show
> > > up
> > > in the same exact way in the same file across both USB disks.
> > > OTOH, the second approach would allow the exact error in the backup on
> > USB
> > > disk 1 to be copied to USB disk 2.
> > >
> > > I am leaning towards repeating the backup on two drives.
> > >
> > > My understanding is that files that are backed up (using either rsync or
> > > smb) are 'encrypted' (for lack of a better word), and to view them I
> > need to
> > > use zcat.-True?
> >
> > There is a better word -- *compressed*
> >
> So that is the word that is not clearly used in the documentation. There
> are many ways that backups can be manipulated: stored in a completely
> nonstandard/proprietary file system and protocol such as z-san, they can be
> encrypted, and they can be compressed. The backup PC doc talks about using
> compression, but does not state if any compression is used in the default
> configuration. Compression is often configuration parameter. It does not
> make sense to compress many audio and video formats. If the data to be
> backed up consists predominantly of these types of files, then it makes no
> sense to waste CPU cycles applying compression to get < 5% compression.
>
>
> > > Also, can the backup profile be specified to perform complete data
> > copies
> > > periodically, as opposed to a baseline and then periodic incrementals?
> >
> > Read the documentation and FAQ.
> >
> I have read the doc, (where IMHO) this should have been clearly stated.
> Instead the doc frequently introduces a topic with 1-2 sentences, then goes
> off on a tangent for 1-3 paragraphs about how things were done in a previous
> verson (completely irrevelant), or talks about what will be comming (again,
> irrelevant), or points one to another section of the doc, in the middle of
> some other thread that is related to the topic but does not address the
> topic at hand, or, introduces a topic, then talks about 3-4 other ways to
> accomplish the same thing, without telling the reader exactly how to do the
> initial topic to begin with. So my fault...I need to also read FAQs.
>
> >
> > > Lastly, does anyone have a statistical number that represents the
> > > probability of a backup file (e.g. on the target backup disk) containing
> > an
> > > error introduced
> > > by the backup procedure? I know there are error probabilities for both
> > disk
> > > and tape reads/writes failures, but am wondering if anything like that
> > > exists for the backup software. (A group I used to work with did this
> > sort
> > > of testing, and actually had some statistics on the reliability of
> > backup
> > > programs, wrt types of files, sizes, w/wo compression, and the types of
> > > compression. Not sure the open source community would go through this
> > type
> > > of assessment - but thought I'd ask.
> >
> > The probability is either 0 if no bugs in the software (or your
> > configuration of it) or 100% if bugs in the software and your dataset
> > triggers the bug. Your question is not very well-framed and pretty
> > meaningless. I suggest you learn a bit more about backup in general
> > and backuppc in particular. There is a lot of good documentation on
> > BackupPC in the Wikki and in the archives, I suggest you reference it...
>
>
> Well, in the extremely simplistic and ideal case, it is 0 or 1. In the real
> world, where algorithms are badly designed, or implemented, or both, then
> problems arise due to things not originally considered in the development
> which cause errors to arise in the backup procedure that is not about the
> conversion of 0/1's in computer memory or the transferring of them to tape,
> disk, etc.
> The question to you may be meaningless, but it is not to me, and it wasn't
> to an R&D group that I worked in to look at this precise issue.
> Again, the documentation (e.g. manual) for backup PC, leaves a lot to be
> desired. While I was reading through the issues in the forum, it struck me
> the number of times I came across the phrase "I followed the directions and
> it did not work/having trouble," etc. I guess I have to spend a lot of
> time searching archives to find this info, and then figure out if it applies
> to this version, or a previous version.
> -J
>
>
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
> > Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > BackupPC-users mailing list
> > BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
