BackupPC-users

[BackupPC-users] fulls vs incrementals (was: how to have 1 full backup + incrementals forever?)

2009-10-20 11:59:44
Subject: [BackupPC-users] fulls vs incrementals (was: how to have 1 full backup + incrementals forever?)
From: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li AT gmail DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:57:12 -0400
2009/10/20 Michael Stowe <mstowe AT chicago.us.mensa DOT org>:
> If you're going to keep all those incrementals, I wouldn't recommend doing
> full backups any less frequently than every two weeks or so, which is
> often the point at which they become as slow or slower than full backups.

I'm not sure if I can agree with this, since this is definitely not my
experience. Even after a month, there are pc's on my network where
incrementals (rsync-based) still run significantly faster than fulls.


-- 
cheers,
-ambrose

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>