Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Johan Ehnberg wrote at about 10:16:05 +0300 on Wednesday, April 8, 2009:
>  > Actually it should be possible to use any protocol. However, because of
>  > a bug that only now is being fixed, Windows clients with SSH server and
>  > rsync have not been possible.
> 
>>>From my experimentation, the issue seems to be associated with the
> rsync protocol used which now downgrades to protocol 28 (if I recall
> correctly). The problem doesn't occur with protocol 30 but backuppc
> won't be able to use protocol 30 unless and until perl-File-RsyncP is
> updated.
> 
> Are you saying that there is another way to "fix" the problem that is
> currently in the works or are you assuming that perl-File-RsyncP is
> being updated?
> 

Referring to Craig Barratt's mail on this list maybe a week or two ago, 
yes. And no, I have not seen any other fix. He and others have been 
experimenting with either using FUSE to get around this, or updating to 
version 30.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/