BackupPC-users

[BackupPC-users] Fatal error (bad version): Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server

2008-07-31 08:15:35
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Fatal error (bad version): Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
From: Chris Cross <xcross AT us.ibm DOT com>
To: backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:15:15 -0400

Hi,
I'm just getting started trying to set up and get the following error in the log. Is the backuppc server trying to start an X program on the backup client? Is the first Xlib connection error leading to the second error, 'fileListReceive failed' ?


Contents of file /var/lib/backuppc/pc/imbroglio/XferLOG.bad, modified 2008-07-31 06:00:06 (Extracting only Errors)

Running: /usr/bin/ssh -q -x -l root imbroglio /usr/bin/rsync --server --sender --numeric-ids --perms --owner --group --devices --links --times --block-size=2048 --recursive -D --exclude=/proc --ignore-times . /
Xfer PIDs are now 6664
Got remote protocol 1651076184
Fatal error (bad version): Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: No protocol specified


Sent exclude: /proc
Read EOF:
Tried again: got 0 bytes
fileListReceive() failed
Done: 0 files, 0 bytes
Got fatal error during xfer (fileListReceive failed)
Backup aborted (fileListReceive failed)


Thanks,
Chris


Chris Cross
DataPower Development
xcross AT us.ibm DOT com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>