Re: Busted Tape Drive

Subject:	Re: Busted Tape Drive
From:	"Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
To:	"Steven Backus" <backus AT whimsy.med.utah DOT edu>
Date:	Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:36:17 -0400

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Steven Backus
<backus AT whimsy.med.utah DOT edu> wrote:
> This could be it, does amanda use this for tape commands?

Amanda uses what was supplied in the TAPEDEV parameter directly.

Dustin

-- 
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus Re: Busted Tape Drive, Chris Hoogendyk Re: Busted Tape Drive, Ingo Freund Re: Busted Tape Drive, Matthew Marlowe Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus Re: Busted Tape Drive, Dustin J. Mitchell <= Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus Re: Busted Tape Drive, John E Hein Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus Re: Busted Tape Drive, Dustin J. Mitchell Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus Re: Busted Tape Drive, Dustin J. Mitchell Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus Re: Busted Tape Drive, Matthew Marlowe

Previous by Date:	Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus
Next by Date:	Re: Testing for Amanda-2.6.0p2, Dustin J. Mitchell
Previous by Thread:	Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus
Next by Thread:	Re: Busted Tape Drive, Steven Backus
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]