Amanda-Users

Re: amstatus: no estimate and disk was stranded on waitq

2007-07-26 00:56:50
Subject: Re: amstatus: no estimate and disk was stranded on waitq
From: fedora <zuki AT abamon DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Hi guys. Hopefully I will get the answer as soon as possible :confused:


fedora wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> fedora schrieb:
>> Questions:
>> 1) "No writable valid tape found". What does it mean?
> 
> There was no tape in your drive/changer or it was not writeable (write 
> protected, broken tape, no tape with valid label,...)
> 
> 
>> Actually I am using tapeless. I made HDD as virtual tape (tapetype
>> HARD-DISK). The tape was writable (drwxrwx---), I think it could be
>> broken tape. How do we know the tape is broken or not? Do I need to
>> delete the broken tape and do amlabel again if the tape broken?
>> 
> 
>> 2) Do I need to run amflush? I found out a folder in holding disk dated
>> 23
>> July 2007.
> 
> If the folder isn't empty, you have to run amflush, if you want to have
> your 
> data on tape.
> 
> 
>> If I run amflush, would it same integrity with actual files in client?
>> Why does it remains in holding disk? Is it because it can't  writing to
>> tape?
>>   
> 
>> 3) "can't switch to incremental dump". What does it mean? (causing failed
>> for the dump summary "domin11 -/lib/mysql 0 FAILED......." )
> 
> Amanda can't do a full dump on your tape, because of to less space. And 
> without having a full dump, Amanda can't do an incremental dump. This
> could 
> happen if you only use one tape and the estimated size is compressed (if
> you 
> use compression) bigger than your tape. Or you use more tapes and you
> don't 
> use splitting, ...
> 
> 
>> here is my amanda.conf settings:
>> runtapes 1
>> use 60000 Mb (holdingdisk) of 1.1T HDD
>> I don't think the compression size is bigger than tape. Can u guys
>> suggest me what should I do? Run multiple tapes with splitting? I've no
>> idea how to do splitting. Pls advice.
>> 
> 
>> 4) "cannot overwrite active tape DailySet1*".  What does it mean?
> 
> Seams you have too less tapes configured for one dumpcycle. Dumpcycle is
> the 
> number of of days in a backup cycle (e.g. one week). Amanda tries to do a
> full 
> backup at least this often (e.g. once per week). When you have e.g. 
> runspercycle=7 (how often you let amanda do amdump in dumpcycle) and a 
> tapecycle of 6, then amanda had to overwrite the first tape again to do
> the 
> backup on the last day. And this is what the message means. You can't 
> overwrite the tape, because you could never do a restore then, because of
> the 
> overwritten first tape. Amanda prevent you doing that.
> 
> # man amanda.conf
> - > tapecycle
> This is calculated by multiplying the number of amdump runs per dump cycle 
> (runspercycle parameter) times the number of tapes used per run (runtapes 
> parameter). Typically two to four times this calculated number of tapes
> are in 
> rotation.
> 
> 
>> here is my amanda.conf settings:
>> dumpcycle 14 days
>> #runspercycle 20 (commented)
>> tapecycle 14 tapes
>> bumpsize 20 Mb 
>> maxdumpsize -1
>> 
> 
> 
>> 5) "taper: changer problem: 11 file:/backup/amanda/dumps/tape11". What
>> does
>> it mean?
> 
> Somethings wrong with your changer. :-) Any more information?
> 
> 
>> here is my amanda.conf settings:
>> tapedev "/dev/null"
>> tpchanger "chg-multi"
>> #changerfile "/usr/local/etc/amanda/DailySet1/changer" (commented)
>> #changerfile "/usr/local/etc/amanda/DailySet1/changer-status" (commented)
>> changerfile "/usr/local/etc/amanda/DailySet1/changer.conf" 
>> #changerdev "/dev/null" (commented)
>> 
> 
>> 7) Lastly, all my client servers got N/A result for the taper stats
>> accept
>> domain11. Why?
> Amanda clients running? Firewalls? Any messages inside the logs?
> 
> 
>> No error in logfiles. Amanda client is running checking by netstat -auv
>> and /etc/initd/xinetd status. I didn't change the firewall. I think if
>> firewall is blocked I will be return failed or missing in dump summary.
>> However the dumper stats has value.  May I know in this situation is the
>> backup successfull?
>> 
>> DUMP SUMMARY:
>>                                        DUMPER STATS               TAPER
>> STATS 
>> HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-MB  OUT-MB  COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s MMM:SS  
>> KB/s
>> -------------------------- -------------------------------------
>> -------------
>> doamin1 -/lib/mysql 1    5782    1307   22.6  651:09   34.3   N/A    N/A 
>> domain2 -/lib/mysql 1       0       0   10.0    0:01    1.1   N/A    N/A 
>> 
> 
> Any helps would be appreciated. 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/amstatus%3A-no-estimate-and-disk-was-stranded-on-waitq-tf4108528.html#a11804128
Sent from the Amanda - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.