On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:40:06PM -0400, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:07 +0200, Radek Brich wrote:

> > Can amanda 2.5.1p3 really talk IPv6? I think it doesn't support it at all.
> 
> Looks like you're right - I see your bug #198351 in RedHat bugzilla. Any
> idea when we might see Amanda 2.5.2 in FC7 updates? And until then,
> ought I just to downgrade xinetd to the last known working version?

I am currently running F7 with xinetd-2.3.14-12.fc7 and no problems,
but this is an IPv4 network. I believe the previous version of xinetd
is that in the Fedora repo. The one in the Fedora repo also works,
without the workround line.

After you changed the xinetd file for amanda, did you restart xinetd?

-- 

Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word docs in email

Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB

pgpAjChNM2ZYj.pgp
Description: PGP signature