Re: amanda performance
2005-12-16 16:20:09
On Friday 16 December 2005 15:58, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 at 3:39pm, Gene Heskett wrote
>
>> On Friday 16 December 2005 13:30, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>>> I've got a 4 disk SATA RAID0 on a 3ware controller for the holding
>>> disk.
>>
>> And what speeds are reported by "hdparm -tT /dev/md0"?
>
>How about bonnie++ numbers (thus including FS performance, and ext3
> ain't all that stellar a performer):
>
>[jlb@youknowwho jlb]$ bonnie++ -f -s 4096
>Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
> --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
> --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
> %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP youknowwho.egr.d 4G 157490 74
> 76721 26 193369 29 361.7 1 ------Sequential Create------
> --------Random Create-------- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 1359 72 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 2050
> 99 +++++ +++ 6848 98
>
>>> Yep. In my case, the library is the only thing on the SCSI chain.
>>
>> Which means the data has to piped thru the pci bus, so the maximum
>> on a non-pci-x buss is 133MB/sec. And the average will be somethat
>> less
>
>Not true. Standard PCI goes up to 64bit/66MHz, which translates to
I've yet to find a pci buss that will run at 66mhz. And I was under
the impression it was only 32 bits wide, 4 bytes per buss cycle at
33mhz=132 megabytes/second. Minus handshaking etc.
pci-x is of course a different horse that can approach gigabyte
performance.
>>500MB/s. The 3ware card is 64/66. The SCSI card is PCI-X at
>
>64bit/133MHz, which is >1000MB/s.
Ah, you didn't say pci-x before.
>> than that when the handshaking is factored in. But only 2.5MB/Sec
>> says there is a very small pinhole someplace its being forced
>> through.
>
>Oh yes, indeed.
Still true. That bonnie report word wrapped unforch.
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should use this
address: <gene.heskett AT verizononline DOT net> which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
|
|
|