Amanda-Users

Re: amanda performance

2005-12-16 16:04:39
Subject: Re: amanda performance
From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:58:00 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 at 3:39pm, Gene Heskett wrote

On Friday 16 December 2005 13:30, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:

I've got a 4 disk SATA RAID0 on a 3ware controller for the holding
disk.

And what speeds are reported by "hdparm -tT /dev/md0"?

How about bonnie++ numbers (thus including FS performance, and ext3 ain't all that stellar a performer):

[jlb@youknowwho jlb]$ bonnie++ -f -s 4096
Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
youknowwho.egr.d 4G           157490  74 76721  26           193369  29 361.7 1
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16  1359  72 +++++ +++ +++++ +++  2050  99 +++++ +++  6848 98

Yep.  In my case, the library is the only thing on the SCSI chain.

Which means the data has to piped thru the pci bus, so the maximum on a
non-pci-x buss is 133MB/sec.  And the average will be somethat less

Not true. Standard PCI goes up to 64bit/66MHz, which translates to
500MB/s. The 3ware card is 64/66. The SCSI card is PCI-X at
64bit/133MHz, which is >1000MB/s.

than that when the handshaking is factored in.  But only 2.5MB/Sec
says there is a very small pinhole someplace its being forced through.

Oh yes, indeed.

--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>