Amanda-Users

Re: "client" and "server" terminology backwards in the docs?

2005-12-04 01:10:52
Subject: Re: "client" and "server" terminology backwards in the docs?
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 00:51:33 -0500
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:36:36PM -0700, mindfuq AT verizon DOT net wrote:
> I've been reading the documentation on amanda.org, and it seems the
> authors have this terminology flipped.  Servers always passively
> *listen* for a connection, while clients are active initiators.  In
> the Amanda model, the centralized backup host is actually a *client*,
> because it's the active "consumer" that initiates connections, whereas
> all the nodes on the network that have data to backup are servers
> listening for a client - and serving the data on request.
> 
> I find it confusing to read the Amanda documentation, because it
> appears the Amanda Core Team is calling the server a "client", and
> vice versa.  

You are trying for absolutes and there are precious few.

Another example of a "server" initiating the connection is 
the X server when it initiates the connection with X terminals
or PC serving as X terminals using the XDMCP protocol.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)