Amanda-Users

Re: "client" and "server" terminology backwards in the docs?

2005-12-03 23:03:36
Subject: Re: "client" and "server" terminology backwards in the docs?
From: Yan Seiner <yan AT seiner DOT com>
To: mindfuq AT verizon DOT net
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 19:47:13 -0800
mindfuq AT verizon DOT net wrote:

I've been reading the documentation on amanda.org, and it seems the
authors have this terminology flipped.  Servers always passively
*listen* for a connection, while clients are active initiators.  In
the Amanda model, the centralized backup host is actually a *client*,
because it's the active "consumer" that initiates connections, whereas
all the nodes on the network that have data to backup are servers
listening for a client - and serving the data on request.

Well, the 'usual' viewpoint is that servers have the resources, and the clients request them. So if you consider the backup device a resource, then the terminology is correct.

OTOH if you consider the data a resource, and the backup device as requesting it, then you are correct....

It's really a matter of viewpoint....