Le samedi 02 juillet 2005 à 13:31 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:17:11PM +0200, Eric DOUTRELEAU wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > with changing index to index yes it didn't solved my problem.
> > 
> > and the output if the commands give me the same output.
> > 
> > the only thing that i can see about the hosts that failed is that they a 
> > lot of
> > partition to backup.
> > 
> > one has 20 and the othr 36
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Selon Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:36:18PM +0200, ERic Doutreleau wrote:
> > > > Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to
> > > > my problems.
> > > >
> > > > i will test that that night
> > > >
> > > > thanks for your answer
> > > >
> > > > Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit :
> > > > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> > > > > > i have a problem with index creation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are
> > > > > > always empty.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Just to confirm, do you have just the word "index",
> > > > > or is it "index yes"?  Should be the latter.
> 
> 
> Do you specify spindle numbers for those DLEs to prevent
> all 20 and 36 from trying to be backed up at the same time?
> 

yes i did
the backup are running fine it s only the index the problem

> I seem to recall some problem with udp packet size and
> large number of DLEs.
> 
well it was what i was thinking of
i will search the archive for that.