Amanda-Users

Re: problems with index creation

2005-07-02 13:48:37
Subject: Re: problems with index creation
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 13:31:32 -0400
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:17:11PM +0200, Eric DOUTRELEAU wrote:
> Hi
> 
> with changing index to index yes it didn't solved my problem.
> 
> and the output if the commands give me the same output.
> 
> the only thing that i can see about the hosts that failed is that they a lot 
> of
> partition to backup.
> 
> one has 20 and the othr 36
> 
> 
> 
> Selon Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:36:18PM +0200, ERic Doutreleau wrote:
> > > Indeed i have index yes for almost type except some that are realted to
> > > my problems.
> > >
> > > i will test that that night
> > >
> > > thanks for your answer
> > >
> > > Le vendredi 01 juillet 2005 à 07:25 -0400, Jon LaBadie a écrit :
> > > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> > > > > i have a problem with index creation.
> > > > >
> > > > > i have out the word index on my dumptype but the index created are
> > > > > always empty.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Just to confirm, do you have just the word "index",
> > > > or is it "index yes"?  Should be the latter.


Do you specify spindle numbers for those DLEs to prevent
all 20 and 36 from trying to be backed up at the same time?

I seem to recall some problem with udp packet size and
large number of DLEs.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>