Re: tapecycle <= runspercycle
2004-06-23 09:39:08
Paul Bijnens --> amanda-users (2004-06-23 14:53:04 +0200):
> In that case, yes, just ignore the note.
OK, I'll try that... But hmm, why does one get warned if
tapecycle <= runspercycle? How could that be a problem?
> Oops. I was wrong. The note is there indeed.
> (why didn't I see that this morning?)
You probably tried out the advice you gave me ;-)
Regards, Jukka
--
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~
|
|
|