Amanda-Users

Re: tapecycle <= runspercycle

2004-06-23 09:39:08
Subject: Re: tapecycle <= runspercycle
From: Jukka Salmi <jukka-amanda AT 2004.salmi DOT ch>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:30:41 +0200
Paul Bijnens --> amanda-users (2004-06-23 14:53:04 +0200):
> In that case, yes, just ignore the note.

OK, I'll try that... But hmm, why does one get warned if
tapecycle <= runspercycle? How could that be a problem?


> Oops.  I was wrong.  The note is there indeed.
> (why didn't I see that this morning?)

You probably tried out the advice you gave me ;-)


Regards, Jukka

-- 
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>