Amanda-Users

Re: tapecycle <= runspercycle

2004-06-23 08:50:50
Subject: Re: tapecycle <= runspercycle
From: Jukka Salmi <jukka-amanda AT 2004.salmi DOT ch>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:42:41 +0200
Paul Bijnens --> amanda-users (2004-06-23 13:14:45 +0200):
> Jukka Salmi wrote:
> 
> >To achieve this I set dumpcycle and runspercycle to 0, and tapecycle
> >and runtapes to 1.
> >
> >This seems to work so far, except for the planner being discontent:
> >
> >NOTES:
> >  planner: tapecycle (1) <= runspercycle (1)
> 
> If I try this in amanda 2.4.4p3, then planner does not warn.

Strange. I had a short look at planner.c, seems that part was not changed
between 2.4.4p2 and p3 (see line 336 ff.).


> Have you really set runspercycle=0 and not 1, as the errors message
> suggests?

Yes. "runspercycle 0" means "same as dumpcycle"; dumpcycle is 0 which
means "full backup each run". At least that's how I understand amanda(8).


Cheers, Jukka

-- 
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>