Isn't there a possiblity of port conflict on the server ?

Don't you have to have separate binaries on the server for
the different configs if they are accessing the same ethernet
interface ?

I got around this on my site by having one config backup local
disks and another config backing up disks that where attached
to amanda-clients != amanda-server.

Was that unneccessary on my end ?

> On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 at 12:25pm, Toni Mueller wrote
> 
> > I'm looking for the best way to have several drives backing up a
> > network in parallel. Eg. while one drive makes a backup of machine M1,
> > the next drive saves data from machine M2 and so on. All drives will be
> > contained in one library, served by only one robot. Is this feasible,
> > or do I have to concentrate on RAIT to sequentially back up all
> > machines, but at a higher rate?
> 
> Just use multiple amanda configs.  A server can run multiple configs 
> simultaneously, but a client can only be in one of those configs.
> 
> -- 
> Joshua Baker-LePain
> Department of Biomedical Engineering
> Duke University