Amanda-Users

RE: slow amanda performance on ONE system.

2003-11-05 01:56:41
Subject: RE: slow amanda performance on ONE system.
From: "Dana Bourgeois" <em-lists AT netgods DOT us>
To: "'Chris Kantarjiev'" <cak AT dimebank DOT com>, <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:52:01 -0800
...up to the point where you can't get it back when it fails.  Users also
have an expectation of restoration, Disaster Recovery and uptime.  Space
isn't everything, just the most obvious.


Dana Bourgeois


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org 
> [mailto:owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org] On Behalf Of Chris Kantarjiev
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:39 AM
> To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
> Subject: Re: slow amanda performance on ONE system.
> 
> 
> > >Just an example from our mail server (ca 300 users):
> > >
> > >root@data2:/data# du -h --max-depth=1 | grep MAIL
> > >21G     ./MAIL
> > 
> > Good grief Toomas!  Can you not institute a mail box size 
> limit, about
> > 10 megs maybe?
> 
> No no no. That's completely wrong. Disk is cheap, and the 
> user is king. Remember, the user is paying to use the system, 
> not make it easy for us sysadmins to keep it running.
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>