Amanda-Users

Re: speed of amrecover

2003-04-30 14:36:39
Subject: Re: speed of amrecover
From: Stephen Carville <carville AT cpl DOT net>
To: Amanda Users <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:30:17 -0700
On Wednesday April 30 2003 10:56 am, Gregor Ibic wrote:
> why is amrecover so slow, it seems that reads the entire backup,
> not only the requested file(s).
> using TAR

A tape is not a random access device so it must first be wound forward to the 
position of the tar file and then tar has to read the archive until it 
reaches the file that need to be restored.  If you file is near the end of 
the tape is can certainly seem like it is reading the entire tape.

-- 
Stephen Carville http://www.heronforge.net/~stephen/gnupgkey.txt
===========================================
You have the right to remain helpless. Should you give up this right, 
anything you do will be used against you in a court of law. You have 
the right to an assailant. If you cannot find one yourself, the court 
will release one for you.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>