Amanda-Users

Re: blacklisted verizon mail server

2003-04-04 23:00:40
Subject: Re: blacklisted verizon mail server
From: Stephen Carville <carville AT cpl DOT net>
To: gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:40:40 -0800
Does your outgoing mail go thru out013pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.44]?  That 
server is blacklisted becasue it is an open relay.  I had to whitelist the 
verizon.net domain because some of my employer's customers use verizon 
addresses and the admins at verizon insist that that server is not an open 
relay. 

I tested it.  It _is_ an open relay.  Here is a copy of a test email from 
abuse.net

-------------- begin ------------------------
Return-Path: <spamtest AT verizon DOT net>
Delivered-To: stephen AT localhost.heronforge DOT net
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.heronforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C279001E
        for <stephen@localhost>; Fri,  4 Apr 2003 18:35:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cpl.net [216.117.199.213]
        by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.0)
        for stephen@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:35:04 -0800 
(PST)
Received: by luke.cpl.net (mbox carville)
 (with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.31 1998/05/13) Fri Apr  4 18:33:58 2003)
X-From_: spamtest AT verizon DOT net  Fri Apr  4 18:30:37 2003
Received: from out013.verizon.net (out013pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.44])
        by luke.cpl.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h352Ual71791
        for <carville AT cpl DOT net>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.abuse.net ([208.31.42.77]) by out013.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with SMTP
          id <20030405023137.OILL22779.out013.verizon.net AT www.abuse DOT net>
          for <carville AT cpl DOT net>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:31:37 -0600
To: carville AT cpl DOT net
From: relaytest AT abuse DOT net
Subject: Test for susceptibility of [206.46.170.44] to third-party mail relay
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 02:31:34 GMT
Message-Id: <rlytest-1049509894-14008 AT abuse DOT net>
Sender: carville AT cpl DOT net
X-Sender-IP: 209.189.103.195
X-Envelope: <spamtest AT verizon DOT net> -> <carville AT cpl DOT net>
X-jf: 20010528, 1:1,2:1,3:0,4:0,ad:0,bo:0,di:1,do:1,he:1,ip:1,us:1
Lines: 14
Content-Type: 
X-UID: 11462

This is a test of third-party mail relay, generated via the
Network Abuse Clearinghouse at http://www.abuse.net.

    Target host = 206.46.170.44 verizon.net
    Test performed by <carville AT cpl DOT net> from 209.189.103.195

A well-configured mail server should NOT relay third-party email.
Otherwise, the server is subject to abuse by vandals and spammers,
and probable blacklisting by recipients of the unwanted third-party
e-mail.

For information on how to secure a mail server against third-party
relay, visit <URL: http://www.mail-abuse.org/tsi/>.

---------------------- end ----------------------------

I also tested by the good 'ol telnet to port 25 and type in the commands by 
hand method.

On Friday April 04 2003 04:26 pm, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Jon;  I've sent a nastygram to postmaster AT unconfirmed.dsbl DOT org in an
> attempt to get this fixed.  We'll see if they use their own list
> and it bounces.
>
> Yup, it did, as did my attempted forward of the bounce message to
> postmaster AT verizon DOT net regarding it.  But a seperate message to
> postmaster went thru.
>
> I've also sent a similar msg, but a bit less nasty to
> postmaster AT verizon DOT net.  That one hasn't bounced.
>
> Me, a spammer?  Thats hillarious.  Nosy maybe, a bit of a knowitall
> too (old farts usually get that way, in case no one has noticed :),
> but a spammer?  Boggles the mind.  Good Grief even!
>
> Its raining here, sporadicly, and I have to work the graveyard at
> the transmitter tonight.  Its beginning to get the wobblies
> according to the operators.  And I haven't managed to get all the
> mud off my old 4wd pickup truck from my last trip up there.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>