On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0800, David Olbersen wrote:
>
> And I'm quite confused based on the two. I obviously don't want to have any
> problems using tar, and that last article doesn't leave me with the idea that
> things have been fixed!
>
> I also read the recent posts which make it sound like tar will work just fine.
>
> Due to other reasons I'm using amanda-2.4.1p1 on the backup server, and newer
> versions on the clients.
>
> Any suggestions? This partition could end up being ~100GB or even 200GB.
Works fine here for years with 2.4.2.
Basic scheme, using my large partition, "/w" as an example.
My /w shows this list of files and directories:
dumplist dutch jg1 Packages tape8
dumps InstalledPkg lost+found recov UserGuides
My disklist contains these:
butch /w wcomp-root-tar 2
butch /w/InstalledPkg comp-root-tar 2
butch /w/Packages comp-root-tar 2
butch /w/jg1 comp-root-tar 2
butch /w/tape8 comp-root-tar 2
Note the different dumptype for the /w entry. The only difference is
that dumptype wcomp-root-tar uses a different exclude file than does
comp-root-tar. It specifically excludes ./InstalledPkg, ./Packages,
./jg1, and ./tape8 as well as all the things excluded by the other
dumptypes. So my large disklist entry, /w is broken into 5 pieces,
four getting specific subdirectory trees, the last collecting all
that remains, but not the 4 specific subdir trees.
HTH,
jon
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|