Amanda-Users

Re: dumpdates

2003-02-27 18:38:36
Subject: Re: dumpdates
From: Jay Lessert <jayl AT accelerant DOT net>
To: amanda <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:54:33 -0800
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:39:51PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 at 11:52am, bao wrote
> > /-- barracuda  /junk lev 0 FAILED [/sbin/dump returned 1]
> > |   DUMP: You can't update the dumpdates file when dumping a subdirectory
> 
> You can't use dump to backup anything that isn't a filesystem.  You have 
> to use tar here.

Not quite.

On most (all?) dump/ufsdump/xfsdump... you *CAN* backup a subdirectory,
but you *CAN'T* do an incremental of a subdirectory.

If you specify a subdirectory, Solaris ufsdump soundlessly forces
level=0 and ignores the record (u) flag,  Linux ext2 dump (I believe)
exits if level > 0 or the u flag is set.  This is what Bao is seeing
above.

Both behaviors are appropriately documented in the man pages.

I've got a weekly forced-full amanda config that does ufsdump on
several different subdirectories.  Works great, which is more
than I can say for the GNU tar attempt that preceeded it (yes,
I know GNU tar/Amanda/Solaris works great for everybody else
except me! :-)

-- 
Jay Lessert                               jay_lessert AT accelerant DOT net
Accelerant Networks Inc.                       (voice)1.503.439.3461
Beaverton OR, USA                                (fax)1.503.466.9472

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>