Amanda-Users

Re: Anything against set suid amflush?

2003-02-07 13:55:35
Subject: Re: Anything against set suid amflush?
From: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:23:47 -0500 (EST)
I'd thought that was what amruntar and amrundump where for, those
are already suid ??

> I'm setting up amanda in a company where the everyday operations of tape 
> rotations etc. will be performed by little less than savy users, I got a 
> system going with a tape changer and amanda's email works perfect for the 
> task.
> 
> The only problem is that occasionally backups will spread over tapes on 
> different chargers and I'd prefer to let them flush in the morning rather 
> than reorganize tapes in chargers.
> 
> To keep it short, I want a regular user to be able to run amflush without 
> logging as a more privileged user (I'm even thinking about putting an Icon on 
> their desktop to do that :) )
> 
> I chmodded u+s and o-x /usr/sbin/amflush and added the user to the group.
> 
> Any security concerns? 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Riccardo Parola
> RPWebworks
> Custom WebSolutions
> http://www.rpwebworks.com
> Tel: 386-447-5361


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>