ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Sloooow deletion of objects on Replication target server

2017-07-26 08:09:59
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Sloooow deletion of objects on Replication target server
From: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:02:26 -0400
I kinda feel the same way since my networking folks say it isn't the 10G
links (Xymon shows peaks of 2Gb), eventhough at it's peak processing load
it would be handling 5-TSM servers sending replications across the same 10G
links also used for the NFS.

If the current processes ever finish (delete of 9M objects is now into
48-hours, I will let the server sit for a day-or-two to see if it
improves.  I have noticed that even with the server idle (no processes or
sessions), the CPU load-average was still higher than the 16-threads
available.  I am seriously thinking about going back to the original 96GB
of RAM since it seems a lot of this slowdown started after bumping to 192GB.

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT gmail DOT 
com>
wrote:

> Interesting, why would NFS be the problem if the deletion of objects
> doesn't really touch the storagepools?
>
> I would wager that a straight up dd on the system to create a large file
> via 10Gb/s on NFS would be blazing fast but the database backup is slow
> because it's almost never idle, it's always behind it's intern processes
> such as reorgs.
>
> place your bets! :-)
>
> http://www.strawpoll.me/13536369
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Sasa Drnjevic <Sasa.Drnjevic AT srce DOT hr>
> wrote:
>
> > Not sure of course...But, I would blame NFS
> >
> > Did you check the negotiated speed of your NFS eth 10G ifaces?
> > And that network?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Sasa Drnjevic
> > www.srce.unizg.hr
> >
> >
> > On 24.7.2017. 15:49, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> > > 8-cores/16-threads.  It wasn't bad when it was replicating from
> 4-SP/TSM
> > > servers.  We had to stop all replication due to running out of space
> and
> > > until I finish this cleanup, I have been holding off replication.  So,
> > the
> > > deletion has been running standalone.
> > >
> > > I forgot to mention that DB backups are also running very long.  1.5TB
> DB
> > > backup runs 8+hours to NFS storage.  These are connected via 10G.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Sasa Drnjevic <Sasa.Drnjevic AT srce DOT 
> > > hr>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 24.7.2017. 15:25, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> > >>> Due to lack of resources, we have had to stop replication on one of
> our
> > >> SP
> > >>> servers. The replication target server is 7.1.6.3 RHEL 7, Dell T710
> > with
> > >>> 192GB RAM.  NFS/ISILON storage.
> > >>>
> > >>> After removing replication from the nodes on source server, I have
> been
> > >>> cleaning up the replication server by deleting the filespaces for the
> > >> nodes
> > >>> we are no longer replicating.
> > >>>
> > >>> My issue is the delete filespaces on the replication server is taking
> > >>> forever.  It took over a week to delete one filespace with 31-million
> > >>> objects?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> That is definitely tooooo loooong :-(
> > >>
> > >> It would take 6-8 hrs max, in my environment even under "standard"
> > load...
> > >>
> > >> How many CPU cores does it have?
> > >>
> > >> And how is/was it performing the role of a target repl. server
> > >> performance wise?
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Sasa Drnjevic
> > >> www.srce.unizg.hr
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> To me it is highly unusual to take this long. Your thoughts on this?
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> *Zoltan Forray*
> > >>> Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> > >>> Xymon Monitor Administrator
> > >>> VMware Administrator
> > >>> Virginia Commonwealth University
> > >>> UCC/Office of Technology Services
> > >>> www.ucc.vcu.edu
> > >>> zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
> > >>> Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations
> will
> > >>> never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> > >>> security number or confidential personal information. For more
> details
> > >>> visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Zoltan Forray*
> > > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> > > Xymon Monitor Administrator
> > > VMware Administrator
> > > Virginia Commonwealth University
> > > UCC/Office of Technology Services
> > > www.ucc.vcu.edu
> > > zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
> > > Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
> > > never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> > > security number or confidential personal information. For more details
> > > visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
> > >
> >
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC