Bill,

My concern was that if the copy storage pool was tape, then with small primary 
stgpool volumes there might be a lot more tape mounts required, especially if 
the stgpools are collocated.  Since your output pools are on disk, then the 
higher mount/unmount activity wouldn't be an issue.

..Paul

At 05:50 PM 11/18/2013, Colwell, William F. wrote:
>The BA STG processes on the source move from one primary volume to the next
>without ending the session with the VV server.  I don't think this would
>be any different if the target server wrote directly on to tape.


--
Paul Zarnowski                            Ph: 607-255-4757
Manager of Storage Services               Fx: 607-255-8521
IT at Cornell / Infrastructure            Em: psz1 AT cornell DOT edu
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801