ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500

2013-04-30 10:10:35
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500
From: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:06:30 +0000
No.
You can define the control path on any (and all) drives.
The 2nd cable is if you want to have path failover configured on the drive.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Zoltan Forray
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:04 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500

One more question about this.  The book isn't very clear about whether a 
separate fibre cable is needed between the library and our SAN switch for 
communications. From the book:

*The host server attaches to the library by using fiber cables that connect 
directly to a drive canister or through the library's patch panel.*

Does that mean a separate fibre cable goes to the second connector of the
3592 designated as the "control path" drive(s)?


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT firstenergycorp DOT 
com
> wrote:

> We only have one virt lib defined.  You can see the virt CAP slots in 
> a "show slots" cmd . . . .
>
> ImpExp 0, element number 769
> ImpExp 1, element number 770
> ImpExp 2, element number 771
> ImpExp 3, element number 772
> ImpExp 4, element number 773
> ImpExp 5, element number 774
> ImpExp 6, element number 775
> ImpExp 7, element number 776
> ImpExp 8, element number 777
> ImpExp 9, element number 778
> ImpExp 10, element number 779
> ImpExp 11, element number 780
> ImpExp 12, element number 781
> ImpExp 13, element number 782
> ImpExp 14, element number 783
> ImpExp 15, element number 784
>
> I've at times wondered if you have more than one virt lib if the 
> element numbers would be the same for them, or, unique.
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
> From:   "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>
> To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Date:   04/25/2013 01:04 PM
> Subject:        Re: Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500
> Sent by:        "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
>
>
> I have seen similar weirdness and I never could figure it out exactly, 
> either.
>
> From watching the web interface, as far as I can tell when you put 
> tapes in the door, the arm moves them into a slot, and those slots are 
> assigned a SCSI slot address that corresponds to an I/O door.
>
> When they are checked in by TSM, I don't think the cartridges actually 
> move, they just get assigned new slot numbers that correspond to a 
> storage slot.
>
> So I'm not sure when you need physical slots free and when you don't.
> (I just learned not to put more tapes in the I/O door than there are 
> virtual slots defined, or the checkin won't find them.)
>
> Anybody else have rapport with virtual I/O slots?
> W
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Richard Rhodes
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:28 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500
>
> The virtual I/O slots can be very confusing.
>
> One time we filled our library up due to needing as many tape as possible.
> Every slot was full with either a real tape or cleaning cartridge.   Later
> we tried to eject a tape that was bad.  The checkout cmd failed.  Long 
> store short - there were no open slots in the library, and this made 
> it so the checkout couldn't move the tape to to the virtual export slot, which
> would have put the tape in the CAP.   I really don't understand this - you
> would think it could checkout a tape into the CAP door without needing
> open slots.   After we removed a cleaning cartridges (freeing up one
> slot), the checkout worked correctly.  From what we understand, you 
> need as many open slots in the library as you have virtual I/O slots 
> (CAP door slots), or at least for as many tapes you would want to 
> checkout concurrently.
>
> At least that's what we think happened, which could very well be 
> wrong! As I said, I've found this confusing.  The manuals for the 3584 
> don't really explain this interaction.
>
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:   "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>
> To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Date:   04/25/2013 09:47 AM
> Subject:        Re: Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500
> Sent by:        "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
>
>
> The "virtual I/O slots" only get involved when you put cartridges in 
> through the 16/32 slot physical I/O door.
> For the initial library load, just open the BIG doors and put the 
> tapes directly into the slots yourself.
>
> Then for a SCSI library, the syntax for CHECKIN is slightly different 
> than for your 3494.
>
> checkin libv bubba search=yes status=scratch checklabel=barcode 
> waitt=0
> volrange=TS1000,TS1999
> checkin libv bubba search=bulk status=scratch checklabel=barcode 
> waitt=0
>
> Search =YES tells TSM to checkin from the INSIDE library slots.
> Search=bulk tells TSM to checkin what's in the I/O door (with ALMS, 
> it's a virtual I/O door, but TSM doesn't' know that.)
>
>
> FWIW:
> For the 3494, TSM just tells the 3494 what it wants done, and doesn't 
> know or care where in the library tapes are located.
> All the inventory management is done outboard by the 3494.
> If TSM tells the 3494 to mount a cartridge, he doesn't need to know 
> where the cartridge is, that's handled by the 3494
>
> For a SCSI library, including the TS3500 doing business as a 3584, TSM 
> has to figure out what tapes are in what slots at checkin time, and 
> saves the slot numbers in devconfig so he can send the appropriate 
> commands for cartridge movement.  (e.g., take cartridge from slot 
> 1024, load in drive position 6).  That's why the checkin commands are 
> different.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Zoltan Forray
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 4:37 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500
>
> Again thank you for this additional useful piece of information. But 
> now this brings up another issue/question.
>
> If I am limited to no more than 255 unassigned tapes,  how do I do a 
> mass/bulk checkin of my 1200 plus tapes we are transferring from the 3494?
>
> -------------
> Zoltan Forray
> TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
> Virginia Commonwealth University
> UCC/Office of Technology Services
> zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
> Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations 
> will never use email to request that you reply with your password, 
> social security number or confidential personal information. For more 
> details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
> On Apr 24, 2013 10:34 PM, "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT icfi DOT com> 
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you both for the kind words; I think it's just a matter of 
> > surviving long enough to have all the battle scars - BTDTGTTS.
> >
> > In the interest of completeness, here's one other thing that is 
> > different from the 3494:
> > When you create your logical libraries, modify the "maximum VIO 
> > cartridges" setting.
> > I believe the default is still 16.
> >
> > AFAIK, with a 3494 you can just keep stuffing cartridges in the I/O 
> > door, and it will keep filing them away with an INSERT category code.
> >
> > In the TS3500 w/ALMS, you put cartridges in the physical I/O door, 
> > and the library puts them into the "virtual" I/O door of the 
> > appropriate library partition. But if you put more through the 
> > physical door than the library has virtual I/O slots (before you do 
> > a checkin and clear the virtual I/O slots), weirdness will ensue.  
> > Your checkin will not "see" the extra cartridges.
> >
> > I don't' know of any reason not to set the "maximum VIO cartridges" 
> > to the max setting, which I think is 255.  Somebody else might have 
> > a better idea if there is a downside to that.
> >
> > W
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On 
> > Behalf Of Zoltan Forray
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:39 PM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500
> >
> > Thanks for all the responses - it has been immensely educational and 
> > I have much less trepidation about the upcoming
> > unload-pull-out-3494-push-in-reload-3584 weekend. I am going to miss 
> > my
> > 3494 - been using it since 1995!
> >
> > I agree that Wanda has some of the best documentation/experiences 
> > with TSM, et-al - she should be writing for IBM/Redbooks!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Arbogast, Warren K 
> > <warbogas AT indiana DOT edu
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Zoltan,
> > > The Web Specialist can be used with an https interface, and a 
> > > physical console to the 3584 is available. I have little 
> > > experience with the physical console, but you could determine 
> > > whether it has the features and suits your needs better than the Web 
> > > Specialist.
> > >
> > > Wanda just wrote the Red Book on setting up a 3584. It's more 
> > > complete, easier to comprehend and better organized than anything 
> > > you will find in the official documentation.
> > >
> > > With best wishes to all,
> > > Keith Arbogast
> > > Indiana University
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Zoltan Forray*
> > TSM Software & Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth 
> > University UCC/Office of Technology Services zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 
> > 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable 
> > organizations will never use email to request that you reply with 
> > your password, social security number or confidential personal 
> > information. For more details visit 
> > http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
> >
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the 
> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the 
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent 
> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that 
> any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
> please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never 
use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number 
or confidential personal information. For more details visit 
http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>