ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Any other ideas?

2012-02-12 10:22:32
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Any other ideas?
From: James R Owen <Jim.Owen AT YALE DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:16:35 -0500
Is your new library from SpectraLogic?  If so,
perhaps library is doing MLM pre-scan/autodiscovery of 2000 tapes.
Takes a long......................... time to pre-scan 2000 tapes.
Pre-scan process dominates library processing until it completes.
You can turn that off under Config/MLM or stop it under Maint/MLM.
--
jim.owen AT yale DOT edu (w#203.432.6693, c#203.494.9201, h#203.387.3030)

On 2/12/2012 6:22 AM, Stef Coene wrote:
On Sunday 12 February 2012 09:33:40 you wrote:
  Hi,
We just upgrade a customer from one library to another library.
With the new library did the customer also buy approx 2000 new LTO-5 Tapes.

But now when we are labeling them in TSM it takes forever to run label
libvol. Sure it runs automatic without our help, but still. We have 5 LTO-5
empty tape drives that could be used for labeling at the same time, but the
process only using 1 drive at the time.

I just wonder if anyone else out their have an idea for next time how we
label tapes much faster and time effective?
You can set the library to autolabel.
So when it loads a tape and TSM does not find a label on it, it will write the
label.


stef

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>