[ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool
2011-09-27 16:14:12
The fact you actually need to pay a "VTL license" is just plain scary.
When u bought it, did they think you're gonna use it as a fileserver? I'm not
to specialized into Data Domain, but arent they marketed as backup hardware? So
you get a disk, but if you want to use it for something else than that, you
need to pay a license?
Sorry for sounding bitter, but I've always heard people referring to Data
Domain as a VTL.
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Växel: 08-754 98 00
Fax: 08-754 97 30
daniel.sparrman AT exist DOT se
http://www.existgruppen.se
Posthusgatan 1 761 30 NORRTÄLJE
-----"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> skrev: -----
Till: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Från: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Datum: 09/27/2011 18:55
Ärende: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool
On 09/27/2011 12:02 PM, Rick Adamson wrote:
> The bigger question I have is since the file based storage is
> native to TSM why exactly is using a file based storage
> not supported?
Not supported by what?
If you've got a DD, then the simplest way to connect it to TSM is via
files. Some backup apps require something that looks like a library, in
which case you'd be buying the VTL license.
FWIW, if you're already in DD space, you're paying a pretty penny. The
VTL license isn't chicken feed, I agree, but it's not a major component
of the total cost.
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, (continued)
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool,
Daniel Sparrman <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Allen S. Rout
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Prather, Wanda
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, robert_clark
- [ADSM-L] Re :vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, James Choate
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Richard Rhodes
- Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Rick Adamson
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool, Daniel Sparrman
|
|
|