ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool

2011-09-27 13:49:51
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for pirmary pool
From: Robert Clark <robert.clark7 AT USBANK DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:39:19 -0700
By LANFree, you mean LAN Free to disk?

last time I looked at it, Sanergy was NFS for UNIX hosts, and CIFS for
Windows. (So if you have both platforms in your environment, you needed
two setups.)

If you used NFS for the front-end semantics, you still had some
range-based locking for the shared disk accessed over the SAN. The
presence of the SAN disk and the Sanergy special sauce made this solution
"LAN Free".

If you're just talking about using NFS as a storage target for a storage
agent, then that is something else. Unless you're running TCP/IP over your
FC switches, that NFS traffic is going over the LAN. If the data traffic
flows over the LAN, that isn't LAN Free.

Thanks,
[RC]




From:   Rick Adamson <RickAdamson AT WINN-DIXIE DOT COM>
To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:   09/27/2011 10:28 AM
Subject:        Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for
pirmary pool
Sent by:        "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>



Sorry, By not supported I meant for lan-free. Every bit of documents
I've read only refer to using a physical or virtual tape library.


~Rick


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Allen S. Rout
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:55 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: [ADSM-L] vtl versus file systems for
pirmary pool

On 09/27/2011 12:02 PM, Rick Adamson wrote:


> The bigger question I have is since the file based storage is
 > native to TSM why exactly is using a file based storage
 > not supported?

Not supported by what?

If you've got a DD, then the simplest way to connect it to TSM is via
files.  Some backup apps require something that looks like a library, in
which case you'd be buying the VTL license.

FWIW, if you're already in DD space, you're paying a pretty penny.  The
VTL license isn't chicken feed, I agree, but it's not a major component
of the total cost.


- Allen S. Rout


U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains 
information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy 
laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from 
retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this 
information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have 
received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you 
in advance for your cooperation.



---------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>