ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Questions about vtl useage

2010-06-14 12:12:42
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Questions about vtl useage
From: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:11:35 +0200
Hi,

On 14 jun 2010, at 14:54, Lee, Gary D. wrote:

> Tsm server v5.5.4 running on suse sles9 under zvm 5.3.
> 
> We are in need of expanding our storage.  Currently have an ibm 8100.  The 
> disk is cheap enough, but the licensing for additional storage is outrageous.
> 

I'd say that a ds8100 is way overkill for TSM usage. DS5000 is way more 
suitable, and a lot less expensive.

> We are thinking of switching to using a vtl for onsite storage and doing away 
> with our onsite tape.
> 

Tape has one advantage: idle tapes are almost cost-free. Idle data sitting on 
disk still consumes power. Of course, if the amount of data is small enough 
(few TB) a disk-only solution makes sense. And of course, if your DR 
requirements are that you need access to first byte to be less than a second....

> Are any folks out there using vtl, and if so what kinds and what has been 
> your experience?
> 
> I currently have about 3 tB of onsite tape, looking to at least double that 
> when we pick up the exchange 2007 environment.
> 

3 TB is peanuts. I'd say, buy a DS3000 (or comparable) dedicated to TSM. Will 
be way cheaper than any VTL solution. BTW, where do you keep the backups of all 
other data on your ds8100?


> Thanks for any information.
> 
> 
> Gary Lee
> Senior System Programmer
> Ball State University
> phone: 765-285-1310
> 

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.post AT plcs DOT nl
+31 6 248 21 622

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>