I used to use some custom stuff built with GNU Barcode and perl.  These days
I use the online pdf-based generator at tapelabels.librelogiciel.com.

--Jim


On 6/30/09 3:34 PM, "Len Boyle" <Len.Boyle AT SAS DOT COM> wrote:

> Jim 
> 
> Which software are you using to print your tape labels?
> 
> len
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Jim
> Zajkowski
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:24 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges
> 
> All of my cleaning tapes are "CU" not "L1" (CLNU55CU).  I didn't realize
> there was a specific cleaning tape per LTO generation.
> 
> We print our own labels and found that Xerox Phaser (thermal wax) output was
> too shiny; the 3584 tolerates labels from our HP though.
> 
> --Jim
> 
> 
> On 6/30/09 10:09 AM, "Bill Boyer" <bjdboyer AT VERIZON DOT NET> wrote:
> 
>> Had that problem once with a 3583 library. The CE said to either take an
>> eraser to the labels to dull them, or put a piece of scotch tape over them.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
>> Of
>> Richard Sims
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:48 AM
>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject: Re: Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges
>> 
>> On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Baker, Jane wrote:
>> 
>>> CLNU030L1
>> 
>> That's 9 characters - no good.
>> Your TS3500 Introduction and Planning Guide manual details tape labels
>> for that library.
>> You can probably revert to the "shiny" labels, using a pencil eraser
>> to "de-gloss" them.  I had to do this on some early 3590 labels, which
>> fixed their similar issue.
>> 
>>     Richard Sims
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> !DSPAM:2,4a4a69ab201767794136845!
>