ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges

2009-06-30 11:25:38
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges
From: Jim Zajkowski <jamesez AT UMICH DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:24:18 -0400
All of my cleaning tapes are "CU" not "L1" (CLNU55CU).  I didn't realize
there was a specific cleaning tape per LTO generation.

We print our own labels and found that Xerox Phaser (thermal wax) output was
too shiny; the 3584 tolerates labels from our HP though.

--Jim


On 6/30/09 10:09 AM, "Bill Boyer" <bjdboyer AT VERIZON DOT NET> wrote:

> Had that problem once with a 3583 library. The CE said to either take an
> eraser to the labels to dull them, or put a piece of scotch tape over them.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of
> Richard Sims
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:48 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Query on ultrium cleaning cartridges
> 
> On Jun 30, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Baker, Jane wrote:
> 
>> CLNU030L1
> 
> That's 9 characters - no good.
> Your TS3500 Introduction and Planning Guide manual details tape labels
> for that library.
> You can probably revert to the "shiny" labels, using a pencil eraser
> to "de-gloss" them.  I had to do this on some early 3590 labels, which
> fixed their similar issue.
> 
>     Richard Sims
> 
> !DSPAM:2,4a4a208123431804284693!
>