Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement
2009-02-13 15:14:02
>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:25:23 -0600, "Hart, Charles A" <charles_hart AT UHC
>> DOT COM> said:
> Couple folks just came back from pulse and one of the Labs was the TSM
> Upgrade, apparently some Beta testers are seeing a 40GB upgrade DB
> taking 28Hrs on avg hdw....
Mmm. I don't know if I'm supposed to still be embargoed, but I guess
that if they're talking about it at conferences I can too..
Data point: my 40G DB;
Extract database: 0:41
Insert database: 7:20
This was part of an exercise where they were having me test with a
slightly optimized version too, and that insert time was 5:06.
This is on two-year-old p520s.
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement, Dave Canan
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement, Tim Brown
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement, Richard Sims
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement, Tyree, David
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement, Howard Coles
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement,
Allen S. Rout <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 - article up on SearchStorage, Gee, Norman
|
|
|