Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order
2008-10-14 11:51:48
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:08:54 -0500, Howard Coles <Howard.Coles AT
>> ARDENTHEALTH DOT COM> said:
> The best I can remember you can't "migrate" into a copypool.
Right. :)
Additionally,
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
>> Of Orin Rehorst
>> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:20 PM
>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject: [ADSM-L] Backup order
>>
>> Our TSM was set up to nightly:
>>
>> 1. backup the VTLpool to copypool
>> 2. backup the tapepool to copypool
>> 3. migrate stg VTLpool (to tapepool)
>>
>> Step 2 is tape-to-tape and therefore slow.
I think that you will find tape-to-tape to be as fast or faster than
disk-to-tape.
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [ADSM-L] Slow system object backup on W2K3SP2 w/ 934016 & 940349-v3 hotfixes. (Update for future searches.), Clark, Robert A
- [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file, Orin Rehorst
- Re: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file, Mark Stapleton
- [ADSM-L] Backup order, Orin Rehorst
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order, Mark Stapleton
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order, Remco Post
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order, Steve Roder
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order, Howard Coles
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order,
Allen S. Rout <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order, Howard Coles
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order, Remco Post
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order, Timothy Hughes
- Re: [ADSM-L] Backup order, Remco Post
- Re: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file, Timothy Hughes
- Re: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file, Orin Rehorst
- Re: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file, Lindes, Michael (MED US)
Re: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file, Richard Sims
|
|
|