ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Server-Server Communication and remote vault

2007-12-31 12:48:40
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Server-Server Communication and remote vault
From: "Strand, Neil B." <NBStrand AT LMUS.LEGGMASON DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:48:13 -0500
Sadat,
   You may consider an alternative configuration to protect your data.
   Look into using a NetApp FAS2020 at both sites with a snapmirror
relationship.  You could also put a TSM server and tape library at the
remote site to make a tape copy of mirrored data.  The nice thing of
using snapmirrors is that only changes are propagated, minimizing
bandwidth requirements between both sites.

Cheers.
Neil Strand
Storage Engineer - Legg Mason
Baltimore, MD.
(410) 580-7491
Whatever you can do or believe you can, begin it.
Boldness has genius, power and magic.


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Muhammad Sadat Anwar
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:02 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Server-Server Communication and remote vault

Dear Orville,
:), it is Mbits/sec...:):) so it would take months to complete the
process.. does not seem workable.. Thanks for your help !

Sadat

Orville Lantto wrote:

> If your link is truly 1 MByte/sec, this transfer will take over four
days.  If 1 Mbit/sec, it will take over one month.  Plus, there is a
good chance that the data will have at least one error in it, requiring
an equally lengthy "Reconcile" process.
>
> If this is a one time situation, and you have the time, you can
probably make this work.  Sending tapes is probably a better and more
sure option.
>
> Orville L. Lantto
>
> From: Muhammad Sadat Anwar
> Sent: Mon 12/24/2007 01:26
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Server-Server Communication and remote vault
>
> Dear All,
> Greetings !
>
> Running TSM 5.2.3 (will upgrade shortly) and file server on Windows
> 2003 platform on all locations.
>
> The problem:
> 1- We want our 350GB File data to replicate in other city over WAN
link of 1MB.
> 2- Management do not want to purchase other software for replication.
>
> Solution in my mind:
> 1- Backup as usual with Tivoli.
> 2- Make server to server connection with Tivoli Server in other city
> 3- Send data across to that server for remote vault
> 4- Restore from this remote vault to file server in that city.
>
> How workable this would be?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Sadat

IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason 
therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive 
information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, 
account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely 
delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends 
that you do not send time sensitive 
or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.

This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not 
use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying 
to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>