ADSM-L

Re: incremental backup question

2004-08-12 15:48:15
Subject: Re: incremental backup question
From: "Levi, Ralph" <RLevi AT HESS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:47:59 -0400
I've been looking and looking but don't see how they are being targeted
even before I sent out my question.  The schedule is squeaky clean.  I
even created a brand new schedule just for this one and ran it this
afternoon.  The same thing happened. 

I will keep looking and thanks for responding.

Ralph

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: August 12, 2004 3:37 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: incremental backup question


These directories are being targeted for the backup in some fashion.
Review the dsmsched.log file from the beginning (of the backup cycle) to
see what is going on. Check the schedule definition on the server.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 08/12/2004
12:26:32:

> Does anyone know why I am seeing these messages:
>
> 08/12/2004 03:48:43 Successful incremental backup of
> '\\server001\e$\Users\NRodier\WoodMac CAT\*'
> 08/12/2004 03:48:58 Successful incremental backup of
> '\\server001\e$\Users\PCampisi\tsy\*'
>
> Instead of:
>
> Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$'
>
> This server being backed up in a schedule with over a dozen other
> servers defined by using the web gui.  There aren't any "domain"
> statements in the dsm.opt and no include statements other the the
> generic include *  management-class.
>
> There are lots of exclude statements.
>
> I am running TSM Server 5.1.9 (AIX) and this is from a TSM client
5.1.7
> (w2k).
>
> Thanks,
> Ralph

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>