ADSM-L

Re: Node just sitting In-Progress

2004-07-02 13:12:44
Subject: Re: Node just sitting In-Progress
From: Ted Byrne <ted.byrne AT ADELPHIA DOT NET>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:08:38 -0400
At 12:11 PM 7/2/2004, you wrote:
Timothy

This is one of my pet hates about TSM.

A scheduled backup which is actually in progress - ie actively transferring
data between client and server - shows a status of 'Started'.
A scheduled backup which started but encountered an error, dropped the
session or whatever shows a status of 'In Progress'.

Am I the only one who thinks this is the wrong way round?

FWIW, This is a pet annoyance for me as well, and I'm a big fan of
TSM.  The "In progress" status originally showed up as "(?)" which was
probably more accurate than what it was changed to.  (I would mentally read
that as 'Huh?'.)

When we originally encountered the non-exceptional (?) status, which
certainly qualifies as an exception in my book, we chose translate that
into a status of "Incomplete" in the scripts we were using to report on
event status.  After it was changed to "In Progress", we changed our
scripts to translate the new description to "Incomplete" as well.  It
seemed to convey the actual state of affairs more accurately.

I seem to recall that when I read the original APAR that was opened about
the (?) status, there was a  strong argument that this should be classified
as an exception when using "q ev".  This is obviously not what they chose
to do.

Curiously, the APAR describing the status change to "In progress" (IC33373)
discusses long-running events, and uses "restartable" to describe them.  In
our experience, it almost always indicates a failure of the client (such as
the scheduler service/daemon freezing or dying).  I can't recall ever
seeing one of these events restarted.

-Ted

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>