ADSM-L

Re: When to declare a tape dead

2003-04-21 10:30:23
Subject: Re: When to declare a tape dead
From: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:30:09 -0400
In general I will let tape expire through reclamation or do
a "move data".  Then note the tape number and see if it happens
again, if not I say o.k..  If I have continual problems with a tape,
then I chunk it.  (Or actually in most cases, get a replacement from
IBM.)



David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH      321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:    321.434.5509
david.longo AT health-first DOT org


>>> Adam.J.Boyer AT FRB DOT GOV 04/21/03 09:56AM >>>
Greetings all,

We're currently using a 3494 with 3590E drives, and

I have accumulated several tape volumes with write errors = 1, and one
with
write errors > 1.   Just wondering how I should determine if a  tape
is
truly dead or "mostly-dead", and when a given error is ignorable or
workable?  Is the number of write errors a good indication?

(I've noticed that the errors are distributed across drives, so as not
to
point to a single drive.  Also, all drives have been recently upgraded
to
new microcode.)

Thanks much,
adam


"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 04/21/2003 10:31:40 AM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 
proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or 
privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this 
message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your 
system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, 
directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of 
this message if you are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the 
right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views or 
opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, 
except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a 
particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such 
views or opinions.

==============================================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>